Emergencies and natural disasters can occur at any time, anywhere. Adding to the list of natural disasters such as floods, fires and hurricanes is a growing list of human-orchestrated tragedies. According to an infographic shared by Business Insider, states with a low risk of weather events are not immune to disasters as they are generally ill-prepared. While technology can predict some disasters, they generally cannot be prevented. In the event that a disaster occurs, the governor of the affected state can request assistance from the federal government, which in turn implements Recovery Support Functions (RSF) under the National Disaster Recovery Framework. The framework details the roles of coordinating agencies, primary agencies and supporting organisations. The American National Red Cross (ANRC) is named as a supporting agency; however, they are not a government agency. They are an independent, nonprofit institution under a charter issued by Congress. The charter designated the ANRC to carry out relief terms under the Treaty of Geneva, to coordinate national and international disaster relief efforts, to support mandatory functions in support of the National Response Plan (NRP) of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and to provide support to current and former military personnel and their families. Since its inception, the Red Cross has had an enormous impact on disaster-stricken communities around the world; However, frequent reports of poorly managed operations, inadequate disaster response, and financial indiscretion raise questions about the organization's credibility. This paper examines the current organizational structure, leadership, disaster response efforts, and financial management in order to make improvements and regain the trust of the American public. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay This review was written to address concerns regarding the conduct of the American National Red Cross (ANRC) during the Hurricane Katrina emergency response. It seeks to determine whether federal charter provisions may have played a role in the organization's poorly orchestrated relief efforts. Provides a historical summary of the ANRC charter, including causes of past revisions. Congress decided to review the ANRC's actions after the federal government received harsh criticism for its role in the failed emergency response. The allegations included inaccurate data management and gross miscalculation of the number of evacuees housed in hotels, racially insensitive gestures by the organization's volunteers, and distribution of financial assistance to unqualified individuals. A committee has been appointed to review the governance and reporting of the Red Cross. The committee found flaws in the organization's ability to coordinate and execute plans and in the poorly organized reception process. Another report analyzed the lack of efforts made to provide assistance to victims in minority areas. Two bills were introduced and subsequently signed to improve the governance structure and clarify the role of the Board of Governors. The report's author, Kevin Kosak, spent eleven years doing nonpartisan research in Congress. He shows no bias in his reports as they are purely informational. It will be helpful to identify the ANRC's past mistakes to prevent them from happening again in the future. This book describes the controversy thatsurrounds the ANRC's handling of charitable donations following the September 11 terrorist attacks. The Red Cross has once again found itself at the center of controversy after being accused of soliciting donations for the victims of 9/11 and subsequently squandering the funds on future needs. To make matters worse, New York has a law that prohibits the use of charitable funds for anything other than the purpose for which it was created. Donations raised by the Red Cross have exceeded one billion dollars, of which a significant portion has been earmarked for future projects. People who donated money to help 9/11 victims have accused the Red Cross of being deceptive in their fundraising plan. In the following days, the president of the Red Cross resigned from her position, but was nevertheless subjected to a congressional hearing in which Congress denounced the organization's decision to withhold over two million dollars intended for victims of the September 11th. Under mounting pressure, the Red Cross assured the public that their donations would be used to help the families and victims of September 11th. The book was written by American economist Eugene Streuerle as an economic vision of philanthropy. Streuerle has served on numerous boards of directors, is the author of 18 books, and has received the TIAA Award for Outstanding Academic Writing. This book is a good example of why Americans are losing faith in nonprofit organizations. It is important to see how the damage was done so it can be repaired. Smith shares the findings of his research on how Red Cross volunteers derive satisfaction from their experiences and, conversely, what experiences have caused them dissatisfaction. The findings correlate with reports of unorganized rescues experienced by the public. When asked about dissatisfaction, top responses included disorganization, poor communication, and lack of education. According to some volunteers, a debriefing should be done before and after rescue operations, but they say they have never seen it in practice. Surprisingly, there were several complaints from managers and volunteers about the mistreatment of volunteers. On one occasion, a volunteer reported spending the night in a broom closet because he had been asked to donate his to a Red Cross leadership team, and others say they rarely hear “thank you” from their leadership team and not feeling appreciated by their managers. managers. The findings are significant as they demonstrate unhealthy behaviors known to cause organizational dysfunction. If seemingly insignificant problems related to poor communication and lack of leadership are not resolved, the Red Cross will continue to perform poorly in emergency situations. The study was conducted by Smith and Grove less than three years ago, so the information should still be applicable. The importance of this study was affirmed when it was presented at a nonprofit research association and public administration annual conference in 2016. Repeated allegations about the ANRC's failure to adequately respond to disasters have prompted the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to conduct a review of their response procedures. While the ANRC is subject to government oversight, it does not include disaster response performance. The GAO examined three different climate-related disasters that occurred in different regions so that their findings would be generalized. The report identifies factors that most likely led to ineffective response services, including: Poor