The death penalty has been a hotly debated and talked about topic among Singaporeans, from teenagers to the elderly. In this essay, the researchers attempt to understand why Singaporeans support the death penalty and what the numbers are. This research is a good way to test the words of the Singapore government as it has always said that the majority of Singaporeans support the death penalty. Therefore continue the practice of the death penalty. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayResearchers argue that Singaporeans are always assumed to support the death penalty. The prosecution was based on the Singapore Court of Appeal case Chew Seow Leng v Public Prosecutor (2005), in which the court found that Singaporean society showed a strong revulsion towards drug trafficking and the defendant's lawyers they had not demonstrated to the court that society's view on drug trafficking and the death penalty had changed. The researchers therefore believe that if a lack of public support for the death penalty was demonstrated, changes, such as abolition, could be made to the use of the death penalty in Singapore. death penalty suffered by Singapore citizens, researchers asked respondents whether the number of people executed in the past 10 years was high, average or too low. Over 50% of respondents think the number is just cute. 8% believe the number is too low, while the rest believe it is too high. It was also found that 7 out of 10 Singaporeans support the death penalty. Understanding why there was majority support is critical to abolishing the death penalty. Two questions were then asked to the interviewees. The two questions were whether they would support the death penalty if (1) new scientific evidence showed that the death penalty was no better deterrent than life imprisonment or very long imprisonment, and (2) if it was shown that people innocent people were executed by an error in the court's ruling. Statistics state that 6 out of 10 still showed support while the remainder changed their support. The change of opinion occurred on the basis that the death penalty is successful as a deterrent, but it was not justifiable to continue using an effective deterrent at the expense of the lives of innocent people. Research shows that people's support for the death penalty can vary based on a variety of scenarios ranging from deterrence to wrongful conviction. This shows that Singaporeans are not well educated on the topic of the death penalty. Thus, this research is effective in demonstrating that Singaporeans lack interest and knowledge on the topic of the death penalty. A major flaw I find in all research is that researchers treat opinions as facts. The truth is that a fact is a statement that can be supported as true or false by data or evidence. An opinion, however, is a personal expression of feelings and thoughts that may not be established by data. Take, for example, some people who believe that the world is not round, but flat. Despite scientists denying it, these opinions are still alive. It is important to recognize the distinction between fact and opinion. While everyone is entitled to an opinion, some of them are not equally valuable. I disagree with researchers that lay people's opinions would lead to the abolition of the death penalty and allow lay people's opinions to decide whether murderers and drug traffickers should be hanged. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom document now come on.131.