Canada is a place known to many for being a multicultural country. While in many minds it's thought to be a good thing, it also tends to be a bad thing. This is demonstrated in the essays “No Place Like Home” by Neil Bissondath and “Immigrants, Multiculturalism, and Canadian Citizenship” by Will Kymlicka. Both essays effectively point out why multiculturalism is bad, but also show the method the authors use to write like racism, how both authors use the method of pathos and logos, but also false premises. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay In Neil Bissondath's essay "No Place Like Home" he argues that although multiculturalism has emphasized differences, it has also created a divide. Canada is believed to have a record of racism, which shows an ongoing divide in Quebec. This would also include sexism and various forms of discrimination related to racism. Even today, people are discriminated against based on their physical appearance. As multiculturalism grows in Canada, racism becomes a problem for some. Bissondath goes on to say that despite the harm caused by multiculturalism, many Canadians need to “pursue acceptance of others and not simple tolerance of them” (Bissandath, page 307). What is meant by this quote is that Canadians need to learn to accept others rather than separate themselves because of someone's colour, race or appearance. However, Will Kymlicka states in his essay, the more multiculturalism, the better. Kymlicka says immigrants stand in solidarity and are committed to protecting Canada. Immigrants also accept “the fundamental liberal democratic values ​​and constitutional principles of Canada” (Kymlicka, page 312). In conclusion Neil Bissondath argues that racism has created a problem in Canada by creating a divide, while Will Kymlicka argues that multiculturalism is good and better for Canada. Furthermore, it is also important to highlight how Bissondath uses Pathos' method, while Kymlicka uses Logo's method. Bissondath uses more of an emotional appeal that makes readers interested in the essay, while Kymlicka uses a rational appeal to make readers interested in her essay. Bissondath uses personal stories from her childhood instead of using valid statistics/information like Kymlicka does. Bissondath goes on to tell the story of how he had been alone in Toronto, but when he returned home to visit his parents in Trinidad he realized how much things had changed for him. While reading this story, readers emotionally connect to what he is talking about and what his experience was like and continue to read his work, but they also create an emotional response. While Kymalicka has data and statistics. “52% of Canadians disapproved of black-white marriages in 1968” (Kymlicka, page 313), reading those statistics people tend to see the bigger picture of what is actually true and what was happening in the time of multiculturalism throughout history. at this point in time. When using this method, Kymlicka persuades the audience with the reasons at her disposal. Kymlicka also examines the ethnic and racial diversity of society. As can be seen above, Bissondath uses the Patho method while Kymalicka uses the Logo method. Each of these methods is unique and different when writing. Finally, Bissondath believes that there are some negative consequences of multiculturalism in.