I believe we have a criminal justice system, flawed as it may be. Our system has become unique to each individual, in the different ways each situation is handled. This country's criminal justice system is structured according to our "capitalist society." Because in our society money talks. The fact is, you can't just go out and pay a fee to commit murder and then be done. However, an individual who has a lot of money can afford the best lawyer money can buy and can take all the necessary precautions, which they can spend money, to ensure that they do not go to prison. An example of this is the OJ Simpson case. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The OJ case was once again unique in its situation. He bought one of the best lawyers money can buy. Then in turn that lawyer (Robert Shapiro) went out and formed a team that rivaled any defense team ever assembled. Money in this case was the key to keeping OJ out of prison. Almost all the evidence collected places OJ at the place and time the murder occurred. Now, this is one thing the defense couldn't dispute and they knew it. But when you have a team of lawyers that is the best money can buy, you can rest assured that they will do everything in their power, not necessarily to win, but to keep you out of prison. This is exactly what they did, at the end of the case OJ Simpson was not found innocent, but rather not guilty. The fact is, if the person on trial were a street cleaner from New York, he would probably be in prison right now. If he were assigned a public defender, his chances of staying out of prison would decrease dramatically. Public defenders are always overcrowded and understaffed, so this will automatically limit your options. But if he hired his own lawyer, he wouldn't be able to pay for a high-profile lawyer like Robert Shapiro. So, obviously we have a criminal justice system, and sometimes we can provide justice. But it's definitely flawed. As demonstrated in the Simpson case, money buys a verdict. Perhaps our justice system is suited to minor crimes and cannot be applied to celebrities, athletes or politicians. It seems like every time someone with money walks into a courtroom, they walk out unscathed. But when a minor crime is committed by someone who doesn't have a lot of money, our system seems to provide justice in the appropriate way. For a given case to be double jeopardy, it means that a person would have to have been tried twice and been convicted both times for the same criminal act. There are three examples that are believed to constitute double jeopardy: the OJ trial, the police officers accused of beating Rodney King, and the Miranda trial. All of these cases did not constitute double jeopardy. Some people might argue that they were. But in any case, the first time the person or party was tried, they were not convicted. OJ was acquitted in criminal court, but lost in a civil case. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay So, he won the first time and lost the second trial. The officers involved in the beating of Rodney King were acquitted of excessive force, but were convicted in federal court of violating civil rights. Last but not least, the Supreme Court rejected the Miranda case because the.