Topic > Research Paper on Gun Control to Solve the Problem of Mass Shootings in the United States

IndexBasic ContentBodyConclusionThesis Statement: Stronger gun control laws should be enacted and implemented in the United States to solve the problem of mass shootings mass and reduce crime within its borders. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayContextDo people involved in mass violence suffer from mental illness or are our gun laws being exploited? What leads to that tipping point, how do we prevent mass shootings from happening less or prevent them altogether. We have shootings dating back to 1840. The first dated school shooting on record was November 15, 1840, nearly 160 years ago. While the motive is still uncertain, we can demonstrate that in the modern era, shootings often end with confirmation that a suspect had serious mental issues along with a convoluted backstory. We don't pay enough attention to both major factors in the equation, gun laws in America and mental illness prevention getting worse, as painful as it is to say it happens all over the world and it happens way more than it should, to the point of being almost considered common, which is incredibly inconsolable and tragic. Evelyn Parrish says clients who indulge in violent behavior can trace it back to suffering a traumatic event that their brain can't let go of, which can trigger taking extreme measures to release that stressor, being unstable has a mental impact on the way that person sees the world as a result People can continue to debate whether or not violence is linked to patients with mental illnesses, statistics are increasing, these illnesses are often traced back to the way this person is grown up, to the environment and society that lives alongside them, neglected and isolated is how they perceive themselves, often how parents raise their children in such neglect and abuse can actually influence how that child sees not only himself but the world around him. The way they look at themselves is important, when they grow up in negative or hostile environments they never learn to manage certain emotions, which is extremely heartbreaking because they never find a source of positive and therapeutic support to help them, they feel like a tremendous burden in people's lives, they don't realize they're hurting people until the consequences reach them, when he reads the transcript of Nikolas Cruz's interrogation, he says he feels like he's being overshadowed, like the whole thing is confusing, he knew that what he was doing was wrong but he couldn't get control of his mind. It kept bringing out a “demon,” a voice in his head that told him to do depraved things. “Do you know that everyone has a good side and a bad side? This is my bad side taking over. People like Nikolas can't be said to be stable, the way he talks about his evil side is his corrupted mental stability, the way he grew up was not a childhood that some people are used to. He went through the countless deaths of numerous family members along with his adoptive parents, while that doesn't excuse the evil things he did, it makes you understand what drives a person to that point. It's not just a wave of impressions that arrives overnight. Introduction: Gun control is a controversial topic in the United States of America. In the wake of such a significant number of painful mass shootings, similar to the recent shooting ofLas Vegas, the inescapable gun culture in the United States of America is a creation of the nation's expansive borders, progressive roots, Pilgrim history, and the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment provides that "A well managed militia, being important to the security of a free State, the privilege of individuals to keep themselves ready for battle, shall not be infringed." THE argument made by advocates of tougher gun control laws is that the review focused on civilian armies and not ordinary residents. I am of the opinion that restrictions on the control of firearms have always existed and that they serve to improve the security of the nation and of the various states. Opponents argue, however, that through the provisions of the Second Amendment, people reserve the ability to own guns. Their view is that people need firearms for self-preservation and that gun ownership defeats crime. This argumentative essay argues that stricter gun control laws should be enacted and implemented if the United States is to address the problem of mass shootings and decrease wrongdoing within it. Body On October 1, 2017, the United States witnessed one of the most extremely terrible cases of mass shootings in its history, presumably the most terrible. The shooting, seen in Swift (2017), was directed by a typical gun-loving person. Following the incident, there was anger and unrest across the nation over whether the discussion about gun control was still meaningful. As many as 59 people died in the crash with another 500 suffering actual injuries. This rate alone, and the Second Amendment in any case, explains why the nation desperately needs strong gun control laws. Nothing can compensate human life and it is surprisingly more terrible when life is lost to another individual. It becomes more and more real when a person chooses to kill, come to think of it, as many people as time and other factors would allow them to do so! The most recent gun rate is a reasonable signal that the risk of losing lives due to individual gun abuse is more real than the danger of losing life due to the absence of self-defense. Considering the most recent incidents of mass shootings, along with such other rates of the past, one could easily argue that the Second Amendment is being misinterpreted to mean what the framers of the Constitution never proposed or implied. The opportunity has already arisen for the three branches of the central government, together with the states, to seek an unambiguous reinterpretation of the concept of a "well-directed civil army". There's no way the people who made this fix "approved" of what was seen recently in Las Vegas. As pointed out by Insana R. (2017), "The founding fathers, who lived before the innovation of the Gatling gun, could not have imagined that ordinary citizens would recount the privilege of chasing turkeys, or people, with the ferocity of our days". The Second Amendment undoubtedly does not allow residents to have unrestricted rights to own firearms. A well-vetted volunteer military should infer that a state, or a nation, sufficiently serves its organizations that require the law with the correct ammunition and weapons to ensure safety. This has unfortunately been misinterpreted to mean that anyone can claim a gun. Stricter gun control laws would reduce passes due to separately owned firearms. Street, C. (2016) reports that between 1999 and.