We Were Soldiers Once and Young – Ia Drang- The Battle that Changed the Vietnam War, Shaking Hands with the Devil and Fingerprints in Time - One history of the Guelph Police are three books written from the point of view of popular history. The simple goal of these books was simple enough; they wanted to tell a story, educate their readers about real historical events they knew little about, and educate them further. This was written in chronological order and gives us a detailed backstory leading up to the battle and the sobering aftermath. We were soldiers once and young - Ia Drang - the battle that changed the Vietnam War, was the result of several years of work involving incredible research involving first-person accounts from those who fought in the battle, maps and official documents, American and former military personnel, soldiers' families, former government officials, Vietnamese military officials, and numerous books, articles, and supplemental materials. The book has a simple aim and that is to recognize the efforts of the soldiers who lost their lives in battle and those who fought alongside them in the Plieku campaign in October and November 1965. “This story, therefore, is the our testimony and our tribute to the 234 young Americans who died alongside us during the four days in the Landing Zone X-ray and Landing Zone Albany in Death Valley, 1965." The book begins by listing the names of those who lost life so that their presence is immortalized forever. Moore's is very successful in these attempts and immediately engages the reader. He writes in the first person and, although there is some technical military jargon, he does not bog down the reader. Moore talks about his men and those around him...... in the middle of the newspaper ...... due to a series of “anti-police” articles and the printing of false information. One such example was printed in article from Thursday, September 17, 2009. Not only is the article inaccurate on numerous facts, but the author also takes the liberty of sensationalizing most of the facts. He also failed to report that when police jargon was explained as “incident-free,” he failed to accurately reflect this in his article. A simple read of this article below clearly illustrates my assessment and observations. On Wednesday we published a little story about the Guelph Police Service's tactical unit responding to what it called "a mental health crisis" in the north-eastern corner of the city. Preliminary reports suggested that the man, with some history of mental illness and what one police officer warned was a propensity to become agitated when the man sees police, may have had