For this test, a judge is engaged in a conversation with a human and a machine. Hypothetically, the machine should act and speak as if it were human. The judge is not reflecting on how correct the machine's answers are, but on how close they are to the man's answers. If the judge cannot discover the difference between the two, the machine passes the test. (“Turing Test”, 2012) Personally I don't think this test is valid. A machine, to me, is usually created to do something better, faster, or more efficiently than a human would. This means that if a machine's response is more intelligent, or deeper in thought, than the human response, it is not intelligent, according to the test. A machine should be able to have a more intelligent response than that