This comprehensive rhetorical analysis of "Letter from Birmingham Jail" reveals Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s masterful use of persuasive techniques and emotional appeals to defend civil rights and challenge the unjust social norms of the time. Martin Luther King's "Letter from Birmingham Jail" was written to answer the quintessential "Call to Unity" through a group of Birmingham monks. The monks were integral to the king for meddling in the activities of their city. Dr. King declared that he had every right to fight injustice in the United States in which he lived. The letter he wrote, in response to the “Call For Unity,” and an announcement that he would fight racial inequality was somewhere. The "Letter from Birmingham Jail" was once the most important thing in his life. In this letter, he flawlessly described the reasons why he felt this way, appealing to logic, emotions and ethics. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay "Letter from Birmingham Jail": A Rhetorical Analysis A logical spell is a spell that uses reason, documents, and documented evidence to make a point. King makes a logical plea later in the letter, in which he responds that he has been called an extremist. He solves this problem by saying that many historical figures currently considered heroes thought they were extremists for a long time. He mentions human beings such as Jesus Christ, the apostle Paul, Thomas Jefferson, and Abraham Lincoln. It makes use of reason to create a logical spell for the reader. That is, if he is an extremist because he fights for freedom, then all these different human beings are also extremists. The use of second-hand evidence and evidence provided by others can also be used to organize logical appeals. King offers an example of this when he highlights how the Birmingham police abused activists. Even though he no longer provides an informant, the tournament was being broadcast substantially. King uses evidence to refute the clergymen's accusations. Direct descriptions of movements can also be used to create a logical appeal. King uses a real clarification to specify a predominant point. He talks about how he expected white religious leaders to come and help him, but on the other hand he said they would not cooperate. He presents his thesis by recounting his experience firsthand. However, money owed personally is a reminder that the reader's opinion about the author can be helpful. For this, you want readers to trust you. To garner trust, you should describe why you are doing what you do or explain the goodness of your character to the reader. King begins with the resource of telling the reader why he is writing the letter. Explaining why you are writing can give the reader an idea of ​​what the true capacity of the authors work is. In this way, King exposes his trustworthiness while simultaneously appealing to the reader's emotions. When King establishes his trustworthiness, this is a kind of moral appeal. A moral appeal supports the author's argument with the resource of demonstrating that the creator knows a lot about the topic or defining the author's moral character. Another example of King casting an ethical spell is when he says he had "the honor of serving as president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference." He is building his trustworthiness by telling the reader that he held an administrative role. This means he has authority. In the opening paragraphs of the letter, King compares himself to the apostle Paul..