In an article for the Heritage Foundation, Ryan Anderson, Ph.D. discusses the flaws in the legalization of assisted suicide for terminally ill patients . Anderson summarizes his views in four main points. First, it physically endangers those who are vulnerable due to their health status. Added to this is the lack of trust in the relationship between patient and doctor. Families will also have a burden on their conscience when it comes to death. Ultimately, Anderson believes that by legalizing assisted suicide, the care provided to patients will be compromised by knowledge of this option. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay I personally believe that allowing a person to choose the level of suffering they want to endure should be the foundation of human compassion. The choice of assisted suicide is not one that a terminally ill patient could make from one day to the next. The consideration of death comes as a result of prolonged pain and suffering. While the argument behind euthanasia, or assisted suicide, is old, the accessibility of healthcare is constantly changing and can impact a person's life beyond imagination. People with terminal illnesses must consider the price behind their death, but only at a slower pace. A concern many face, due to affordability and lack of healthcare, is how their family will get out of the huge amount of debt after illness racks up their bills. Someone, terminally ill, in terrible pain and in good conscience, would not want to prolong the situation and saddle their family with hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical bills. While we focus on the choice to live in our society, we often forget the choice on the other side of life, while some may see assisted suicide and euthanasia as a lack of respect for the life we ​​are given, there should be a consideration for the decision those who choose to do in a moment of suffering.