Moral Relativism and Utilitarianism Moral values ​​certainly differ from society to society. This is the charm that makes up our world and that allows us to evaluate and consider different methodologies and opinions. Typically, various cultural factors in a society's environment such as weather, religion, population density, etc., directly influence and contribute to that society's adoption of specific morals and acceptable laws, regardless of whether may or may not be acceptable to another company. For example, the California drought, in previous years, imposed water restrictions and created great awareness of water conservation among the population, where most citizens highly appreciated and respected the available water resources and is committed to reducing water consumption. In contrast, another state, like Vermont, which is typically blessed with abundant rainfall, where its citizens most likely don't care as much about water conservation, perhaps leaving the sink open with constant running water while brushing their teeth , or nonchalantly play with the “slide and slide” with continuous running water to cool off on the hottest summer days. These two societies, due to their environmental circumstances, obviously have different morals regarding water use. Another example to consider, on a larger scale, could be that of China, from 1979 until recently 2014, when it adopted the “one child per family policy”, intended to control the country's overpopulation problems. (1) To enforce this, there were fines for “mistakes,” pressure to terminate further pregnancies, and even “forced sterilizations” for “certain” women after they had already been blessed with a child. (1) These measures are certainly extreme and unacceptable for us Americans, since we lived and do not live similar circumstances, but what should we do with such different morals, both on a personal and corporate level? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Having a universal moral code would be unrealistic, but just because we are not subject to the same cultural factors or circumstances as another, should that give us the right to judge these societies or rather to understand and accept these variations? Since it is differences that generate improvement and progress, it is obvious that we must embrace the diversity of our societies and possibly respect them when visiting or working within their communities. Just as moral normative relativism suggests, “who is to say who is right and who is wrong?” we should show tolerance towards every new situation. Of course exceptions may apply if these different moral values ​​or values ​​are vehemently opposed to yours, for example, India's abuse of women, where it would be our moral and ethical obligation to speak out and adequately challenge and educate for a possible change and improvement of such immoral activity. The differences within societies around the world are very interesting and should be embraced within reason. Like-minded individuals and companies tend to group together to form harmonious communities. It is up to us to find the company that most attracts us and that shares the majority of our personal and corporate ethical beliefs. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay This leads on how we should make morally relevant decisions. We should accept a purely utilitarian approach in which decisions are based on the maxim.