“Day after day, what you choose, what you think and what you do is what you become. ” This quote from Heraclitus made around the 4th century BC remains true today and sums up my hopes studying the classics. I believe that learning from classical literature and history through language will allow me to become an analytical and evaluative thinker, as well as a well-rounded individual. Heraclitus is especially important to me, as he lived under the rule of the Persian Empire. My heritage is Persian. My father's family is Persian and I am named after Darius the Great. It was the stories of the Greco-Persian Wars that first piqued my interest in the classics. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay History, with its emphasis on analysis, interpretation of information, research skills, and decision making, is closely aligned with the study of the classics. The evaluation of the sources present in the body of the course and the controlled evaluation is a technique that will be applied directly in the Classical Degree. It is also possible to make comparisons across the centuries, for example: in studying the repeal of the Corn Laws, it occurred to me that Peel's actions were in line with Cicero's advice to leaders in his text "De Officiis". Peel acted to help the lower classes in the midst of the famine despite significant risks to his own position. Contrast this with modern politicians, particularly the classical scholar Boris Johnson, who unlike Peel appears to have put his own ambitions before the good of the people. My logical thinking has always lent itself to mathematics. During my GCSE Latin course I realized that the problem solving and analytical skills I used in mathematics were helping me with translation in general and Pliny's letters in particular. Likewise, chemistry also helps develop analytical skills, but a unique benefit of studying chemistry is that it taught me objectivity. Detached neutrality is essential in scientific research but is also useful in any area of ​​knowledge. Objectivity can also provide the circumstances in which connections and observations can be made between seemingly unrelated ideas or events; it could be called a special kind of creativity. So, studying the "Principle of Entropy" in Chemistry, which proposes that everything in the universe moves naturally from order to disorder, I was struck by how clearly ancient and modern ideas seemed to mirror each other, with the idea of "Chaos". , which I read about in Stephen Fry's "Mythos", as everything arises from disorder and will eventually return to that state. Having enjoyed the mythology of "Mythos", I decided to look at a primary source and chose "Iliad". While reading the Iliad I was intrigued to learn that it was written in dactylic hexameter. This seemed strange at first, however, further research showed that it was as common in ancient Greek and Roman writing as iambic pentameter is in more modern works. My knowledge of metrics in literature came from studying speech and drama outside of school; covering disciplines such as acting, poetry and public speaking. This led me to look at the work of Euripides, more specifically Medea and Electra, and I noticed similarities between these plays and Shakespeare's works such as the use of two brothers divided at birth and the instances of mistaken identity present in Electra . My other hobby, debating, complements it as a different kind of public performance. These activities taught me the ability to think on my feet and respond to situations 4000