IndexThe argument for why euthanasia should be legalA real life example where euthanasia was deniedConclusionVoluntary euthanasia or assisted suicide is a global debate for many years. One of the main questions posed in this essay is: why should euthanasia be legal? Whether or not there should be limits to our personal autonomy? Personal autonomy refers to the right and ability to be master of one's own body and one's own choices, without manipulation or external influence. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayThe argument for why euthanasia should be legalGenerally those protesting lethal injection are convinced that denying this right is a violation of human rights and people should have the ability to die with dignity and to stop the intense pain. The opposite argument is more complex. There are different perspectives according to which taking one's life prematurely is considered wrong. For example, religious views that believe that life is a gift given by God, consideration of a doctor's oath to do no harm, as well as the risk of people who did not really want to die being killed. theories and ethical principles surrounding this debate, both for and against the legalization of euthanasia. The first theory that goes against euthanasia is the Sanctity of Life. This implies the idea that life should be respected and appreciated as the most precious thing on Earth. This theory goes hand in hand with the religious view that life is a gift from God and we cannot end a life on our own terms. The principle of Ahimsa is a Buddhist prohibition against euthanasia, basically as the prevailing belief of “do no harm.” This theory ties into the doctor's role as healer, as in the original Hippocratic Oath, doctors swore to "do no harm." The expectation that doctors administer a lethal injection goes completely against this oath, and many believe it is unreasonable to make doctors agents of death. This destroys trust between patient and doctor and can be traumatic for the doctor who takes responsibility for purposely taking another person's life even if it was consensual. On the contrary, the aforementioned right to autonomy is a hotly debated point on both sides of euthanasia. discussion. Most people live with the desire to be in control of themselves, whether it be over decisions like their career, love life, or even their personal medical care. The illegality of assisted suicide is seen as a limit to personal autonomy. However, it can be argued that personal autonomy is, and should remain, limited; people can't do what they want. People can't take things from others, they can't kill other people, etc. and this makes the world a safer place and can be seen as a positive thing overall. In favor of legalization, the Principle of Mercy refers to the concept of ending one's pain and suffering, which promotes the use of lethal injection in extreme cases where the patient in question suffers agony that cannot be resolved in other way. Likewise, the value of Death with Dignity suffers from the concept of a person spending their final days suffering immeasurable pain and/or connected to a variety of machines only delaying what is inevitable. A perhaps more impersonal perspective concerns the possibility of financing the maintenance of dying people. The cost of a lethal injection is only a few dollars, compared to a cost..