The United States Army is made up of both male and female soldiers and requires all soldiers to be trained annually on sexual assault. It is often overlooked how much needs to be addressed. My experience with SHARP in my organization has allowed me to understand the dynamics of the program and the unique challenges it faces in the society of civilians working around Soldiers who are not held to the same standards. This article focuses on some of the challenges facing the entire military and my workplace. I have observed and have some specific recommendations that I believe will improve the system and reduce SHARP incidents. We say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The Army's Sexual Harassment and Assault Response and Prevention was implemented in 2012, or better known to soldiers and civilians as "SHARP." The Department of Defense has reported that it is constantly up and down on a roller coaster. Sexual harassment and assault are fundamental violations of Army ethics and violate the DA's expectations that civilians and Soldiers treat all with dignity and respect. 20,500 service members across all branches of the Army had reported cases of sexual assault in fiscal 2018. Across all branches approximately 7,500 men and 13,000 women reported such cases in 2018. These numbers only show that although the Army is taking measures to reduce sexual violence and sexual harassment; the Army still faces several challenges and something needs to change. The organization I work in is made up of 96% civilians. Among these, the main SHARP offenders are men aged between 40 and 60. This leads to the question: Is there a generation gap in communication or is it a problem with policy not being strictly enforced with respect to a soldier? Soldiers are held accountable by the UCMJ as well as civilian lawsuits. A misunderstanding in communication between generations can lead to some big problems. The way young people of any generation communicate with each other typically leaves older generations scratching their heads and not understanding what they did wrong. This is where leaders, both civilian and military, can ask questions and learn from younger generations. “It's about checking in on each other,” he said. “This is what we have to get used to from the bottom up to the top down, mutual control. If we started checking on each other, accidents would decrease. And so that's an important key. We want understanding and good behavior to spread. We want everyone to feel comfortable enough to say, “Hey, stop.” It's not fair.''There are civilians who work at numerous arsenals and depots that are government-owned contractor-operated facilities and feel that the military presence is minimal, so they don't feel like they fit into military policies. Sexual Harassment Policy applies to all DA civilians while on duty, on government property, or engaged in employment (2017). In my organization civilians disagree that they should adhere to the SHARP policy and do not feel the need to attend and maintain mandatory SHARP training. Policies must be supported and rigorously enforced at all levels. For civilians limited reporting should be reinstated as in the one-year pilot program the Army had in 2017. When an individual researches the "SHARP" Sexual Harassment/Assault Prevention and Response Program, they get.