Index IntroductionAdvantages over traditional architectureDisadvantages over traditional architectureIntroductionTraditional computing has long been the backbone of many infrastructures. As technology develops, new ways to do the same thing faster and more efficiently become more and more common. Enter serverless computing. Serverless computing is a relatively new system that facilitates application design and its deployment method using events. This research report will explain in the following paragraphs how these systems work, their advantages and disadvantages. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayHow does a serverless infrastructure work? How does it compare to traditional computing? To know how a serverless infrastructure works, it is important to know that the term “Serverless” does not mean the absence of servers. Instead, the name implies that there is a level of abstraction between the consumer and the server. Serverless frameworks work by creating resources in response to a trigger (events). From that moment the framework sends the code connected to that trigger known as a function. Next, the framework kills the code it finishes executing. This may differ from supplier to supplier. Traditional servers are not limited to functions, which allow them to work with a greater load for a longer period of time than the serverless solution.Advantages compared to traditional architectureCostsSince using serverless architecture does not require much maintenance on the part of the user, it is relatively cheaper than traditional server architecture. This significantly reduces the administrations needed for server security, maintenance and the like. Additionally, serverless functions are smaller and perform simple tasks and only charge the user when the server is up and running. In contrast, a traditional server will require the physical machine itself, which takes time to set up and can be very expensive. Furthermore, the user will have to constantly update their security, fix any bugs, updates, upgrades, etc. In other words, it requires employees to keep a server running. For serverless architecture, everything is done by its vendor reducing costs to allow employees to keep servers updated. This also allows for greater engagement in the company as there isn't much division between employees working on the technical side, increasing efficiency. Another disadvantage of traditional servers is that they must always be active. The user will have to pay for the server even if it is not in use since it is always running. On the other hand, serverless computing uses functions. This allows the user to use functions only when they need them. Once finished, the feature is destroyed and the user no longer pays for its maintenance. This process is also known as microbilling. Setup Time Setup time for serverless computing is significantly shorter than traditional computing, and by a huge margin. For serverless computing, there is no need for a team of system administrators to configure the system as the provider already does it, reducing configuration time. A traditional server will need to be purchased, configured, configured and updated by a team of professionals. It may take a long time before the server can be operational. Additionally, you will need a team to address security, patches, and the likelihood of downtime to compensate. Scalability Serverless computing offers flexible scalability when needed. Cloud servers.