Topic > The morals of life from the sociological perspective in the texts of Ramayana and Gilgamesh

It is known that moral values ​​are the right or wrong way in which a person perceives life. They influence the paths and choices you make, and ultimately, your life depends on them, considering you grow up believing in them. Losing someone can reawaken your morals, or possibly make you lose sight of what you believed in. In the texts of Ramayana and Gilgamesh, the morality of life was awakened in relation to the Sociological Perspective. The sociological perspective, as stated by Campbell, is known to be “the validation and maintenance of an established order.” It can also be wisdom and be the embodiment of morals that ultimately teaches us how to behave and live life. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay In Ramayana, Rama believed the words of people and did not believe in Sita and his devotion towards her. She felt victimized by the rejection of people who claimed that Sita was impure due to her time with Ravana. However, he later demonstrated them all at length. When Sita and Rama's sons, Lava and Kusha, found Rama and his kingdom, they eventually brought Sita back to Rama. She found out that she was faithful after all after seeing that she was the mother of the twins, but it was also confirmed after she fell into the Earth that she was never unfaithful to him. Losing his wife and not being able to see his children grow up most likely awakened one of Rama's morals. The moral would probably be that you shouldn't be so careless as to fall for people's words. Strangers don't know your family better than you do. In Gilgamesh's sense, Gilgamesh lost his best friend Enkidu to the hands of the Gods. He continued to defy the Gods by slaughtering anything considered sacred to them, and so eventually both men had to face the wrath of the Gods. They chose one to die and the other to learn a valuable lesson from death. Fear was instigated in Gilgamesh by the Gods, but a moral was also learned. Gilgamesh should not challenge authority that he has no right to oppose. In addition to losing their loved ones, both men can be remembered for the love they gave to others. Gilgamesh and Rama had both gone on a journey, for their own purposes, however, someone had accompanied them along the way. In a way, the people who accompanied them had also shaped their character in the way we can see it now. Rama set out on his journey with both Lakshmana and his wife Sita to destroy the evil of Ravana. He became more motivated in his journey and continued to build his dharma once his wife was kidnapped. Everything he would do would be because of her and her safety. Likewise, Gilgamesh went on a journey with someone who filled the void in his life as Lakshmana and Sita did with Rama. Enkidu became Gilgamesh's best friend and gave him a purpose and a way to build his character. He was no longer just the cruel tyrant that everyone hated. From this, both characters grew as a whole and learned the moral values ​​of companionship and love. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay There is a kind of similarity in both stories portray a divine perspective, but there is still a big difference in the motives. Rama is already divine, considering he was an incarnation of Vishnu, but he relies on the Gods to help guide him through his path to defeat Ravana. He gets what he wants because he completes his Dharma towards his wife and the Gods. On the other hand, yes.