As mass shootings become more prevalent in today's events and covered by news outlets around the world. There are generally different approaches to this problem. Increase restrictions on firearms or ban them outright, on the other hand allow law-abiding citizens to exercise their Second Amendment rights. It is known that people can be unpredictable and that terrible things can happen at any time and anywhere. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay What makes college campuses different, well, in a court case DiGiacinto against the president and visitors of George Mason University, the university adopted a hide carry ban. The court ruled that higher education institutions are considered a sensitive place. Thus, a “reasonable expectation that the university will maintain a campus free from foreseeable harm.” So, simply marking a college campus as a sensitive environment takes away the use of the Second Amendment from students on said campuses. Should universities have such power to prevent students from protecting their property and lives from a life-threatening situation? Student safety is very important and is something that universities should be concerned about. The amount of crime committed and student safety go hand in hand. An interesting study conducted by Utah Valley University and the University of Tennessee shows the impact of safety and crime when it comes to concealed carry. This study took place in 2013, when both schools had approximately thirty thousand students, with Utah allowing concealed carry and Tennessee prohibiting it. Utah reported four criminal acts while Tennessee reported ninety-seven crimes, of which no drug crimes, hate crimes, disciplinary actions or arrests were included. The problem that arises when determining the correlation between concealed carry on campus and safety is that there isn't much research available yet. When looking at the research on concealed carry on campus and student safety, there is empirical data to support the crimes being committed. on university campuses. Although when it comes to who wears the concealed carriage it is difficult to pinpoint an exact number of students. Being limited not only by the amount of states and universities that allow clandestine carrying, there is also a limiting factor of having 100% survey response rates since those carrying out probably don't want others to know. Given the sensitivity of the topic, anonymity will be practiced. It will be discussed that this research is not for political gain, but to better understand the effects that legal campus transportation has on campus crime and safety. Primarily quantitative data will be used, although qualitative research will be welcomed. School emails with a link to anonymous surveys will be used, as well as classroom surveys, which will provide the opportunity to reach the greatest number of students. Face-to-face interviews will also be offered to those who can share personal experiences of how university transportation has affected their lives. It is critical to conduct research on illegal carrying and its effects on crime and student safety. It is important that this research was conducted as the research that was conducted lacks generalizability and quantitative data. The Second Amendment and the right to self-protection can beconsidered a fundamental human right. Without this research, law-abiding students could be stripped of their Second Amendment rights while on campus. Most, if not all, of the current literature addressing the topic of blind carry on campus points in the direction that firearms have been a large factor in violence. Nearly every empirical newspaper has mentioned a famous mass school shooting at least once. They typically do this in the first few paragraphs, leaving an underlying belief and prejudice that firearms are only associated with terrible accidents and could not protect people from such events. A pattern among the current literature shows a lack of diversity within survey teams, typically from large universities, despite only including a few hundred in the study. Firearms are already a controversial topic and are portrayed in an unpleasant way in the media, when you add the idea of ​​college students being able to carry them secretly it becomes an even more sensitive issue. The Second Amendment states: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed” (United States Constitution. Amendment II). The focus of this would be whether college campuses have the right to violate the rights of the student population. In this regard, Utah quickly decided on the right to conceal carry on campus and took away all power in the matter from the universities "The state legislature passed a law which removes the ability of any state entity to restrict the possession of firearms." Thus, being the first state to make campus concealed carry a state concern and not a university concern regarding legality. Even if in the court case ( DC v. Heller, 2008), “the Court held that individuals have an inherent right to self-defense that is central to the Second Amendment.” Although the Court found the ban on firearms within the home to be unconstitutional, it did not choose to address the scope of the Second Amendment in what it deemed "sensitive places" or outside the home. Generally, government buildings and schools are considered in the classification of sensitive places. This raises an issue that appears to have gone unchallenged in that undergraduate colleges are neither government buildings nor “schools.” The problem lies in the fact that the schools are well defined under California state law, and it does not correspond to what a graduate university is. According to state law, “'a school...includes the grounds of a public or private school offering education in kindergarten through the twelfth grade.” A college is a place of higher education, which being above 12th grade does not classify it as a school, so it would not qualify for a sensitive place. As far as current research goes, there only seemed to be one article that touched on the topic and they seemed to quickly dismiss it. Although it appears that this area of ​​research could benefit from further analysis. Most of the current research literature groups college students into a large group of people between the ages of 18 and 23. Don't analyze everyone, as this would require a huge amount of research and funding. When it comes to legalizing concealed carry on campus, that doesn't mean every student will go out and buy a firearm. There are obvious restrictions set by state and federal laws, as you must be at least twenty-one years old to purchase a gun and pass a background test. So, when researchers suggest “that, given the age range of the studentscollege students, they are likely to experiment with alcohol and drugs, and that is a recipe for trouble – even an accidental discharge on a densely populated campus is likely to hit someone.” such as “frequent workplace disputes, high-stress classes, and competition for resources – all potential causes of increasing violence.” These types of scenarios will always be cause for alarm. Although the potential damage increases due to the increased population of the closed network. This is not to ignore the fact that there is always the possibility of a freak accident, or a crazed person with a firearm, and that should not be limited to just college students. With consistent research, gun owners are known to have remained the same, “older white men, living in the South, rural areas, or people who have conservative political views.” As for colleges that fall demographically in the Midwest, students “are more likely to have a positive, first-hand experience with guns.” In addition, a 2002 study “found that students who owned a functioning firearm in college were more likely to be white, male, live off campus, and attend school in a rural area” (Miller, Hemenway, and Wechsler 2002 ). This helps provide a brief understanding of the potential demographic that would be in favor of, and if able to, conceal carry on campus. Although a large amount of this information is unknown and would greatly benefit from exploratory research. “Over the past few decades, college professors have reported a surge in incivility and behavioral problems with students.” Incivility was described as inattentiveness, e.g., sleeping, arriving late, leaving early, or being hostile, e.g., complaining, arguing. During the 1980s college campuses began to receive greater scrutiny, especially from the media. It was not until 1990 that universities were required to publish their crime statistics, which then created the Student Right to Know and the Campus Security Act. Although not supported by empirical data, it has been noted that any entity such as a university will seek to have the fewest crimes reported. Such actions can be achieved by not personally reporting a robbery that occurred across the street. Although Sloan (1992) and Bromley (1995) both found that violent crimes accounted for only 2%. And according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics (2005) college students between the ages of 18 and 24 experienced fewer violent crimes than nonstudents. When it comes to nonviolent crimes, however, universities experience large amounts of burglaries and thefts. When it comes to concealed carry on campuses, one of the simplest beliefs is that “armed campuses will be a less attractive target for those who want to commit acts of violence.” Although previously stated, violent crime on campuses is extremely low compared to thefts and thefts. It is often believed that these “rates are high because students often fail to adequately protect their property.” According to this data, clandestine transportation on campus would most likely impact the amount of crimes committed. Although it would be difficult to accurately assess his involvement. When it comes to the absence of weapons on campus, this is when the most damage can be done. Without concealed carry, there is no means of deterrence or self-defense for school shooters. Without such protection, students rely on campus and local police to de-escalate the situation. Just as colleges typically have an active shooting procedure that typically involves three steps: avoid the attacker by fleeing,denying him access by closing the doors and defending yourself if that situation arises to try to disarm the attacker. Minutes matter in these situations, and giving students the right to defend themselves with a concealed firearm could mean life or death for hundreds of students. The purpose of this study is to analyze and better understand the effects that concealed carry on campus has on college students. There hasn't been much current research done on the effects it has on crime and safety. Most research instead focuses on student rights and the ability of universities to ban stowaways on campus. This study seeks to uncover a clearer relationship between clandestine carry and its effects on campus crime. The researcher intends to analyze quantitative data collected from surveys sent via university email addresses and classroom surveys. Due to the spread of this study, the single researcher will not be able to help with all surveys in person. This is why the chair of the criminal justice program will administer it at their college. Regarding qualitative data from face-to-face interviews with the use of third parties, regarding personal experiences of using a concealed carry firearm on campus. The data provided by this research will be anonymous. The findings of this research will help fill in the blanks of previous research as concealed carry on campuses is relatively new and understudied. As well as providing a baseline for future results. The goal of this research study is to provide an understanding of how concealed carry on campus impacts students' daily lives, safety and crime. This is important because many universities and states do not support this policy because they believe it contributes to crime or is unnecessary. Having a more descriptive study on the issue could better inform lawmakers about the issues. This study aims to analyze and provide reasonable answers to the following research questions. The researcher first intends to answer the question: do college campuses with legal concealed carry have a different number of crimes committed compared to those with anti-gun laws? This question is very important as it forms the basis of this document and will be studied during the discussion. The second question the researcher wants to answer is: Does the possibility of others being armed deter the likelihood of someone committing a crime? This question is important as it evaluates people's thought process when it comes to the possibility of an immediate reaction from the victim. The third question the researcher aims to answer is: Do college campuses have the right to violate the Second Amendment? Now, this question is really about the morality and ethics of universities deciding what students can and cannot do. The answer to this question will not be clear, but it will be discussed and it is up to everyone to reflect on it. As previously mentioned, previous studies that have been completed have lacked demographic data and generalizable data. Because each state has different laws regarding concealment on campus which gives the possibility of researching in two different groups. The researcher will be able to send anonymous surveys to both universities that allow concealed carry and those that do not. The purpose would be to study students' perceptions of concealed carry on campus and how they believe it would affect their campus and learning experience. As for the other group, those who already have a legal campus bring with them. The researcher will be able todistinguish quantitatively between the two groups. As well as seeing whether clandestine carry has a real effect on crime or just a perception of safety. Surveys are used in this study with the aim of reaching a larger group of participants. To ensure that participants feel comfortable responding, each participant will be told that their information will remain anonymous and that their responses will be used to collect quantitative data. In this way the researcher hopes that more participants will be willing to respond to the survey without fear of judgment or retaliation. Since their answers will not affect their position at the university or any professor. To obtain a certain degree of qualitative data, face-to-face interviews with the help of third parties will be used. This is to ensure that the researcher remains neutral to the participants and truly anonymous. Face-to-face interviews are used to subsidize data and allow for more diverse means of delivery. It will also provide a safe environment for students to discuss their first-hand experiences with campus carry. The desired sample size would consist of approximately five million students to be interviewed, or almost 25% of the university population. The surveys will be distributed to each university, distributed proportionally among students based on the total number of students enrolled. This way there is data from all over the United States, all with the same opportunities. These surveys will be distributed in a manner that does not favor any gender, race, ethnicity or demographic group. The researcher believes that this is the best way as it will provide a more realistic opinion as there is no underlying basis. The researcher predicts a large survey return of 80%. To achieve this goal, if after two weeks the researcher has not seen an 80% return, the researcher will resend the survey to the same population who have yet to complete it. This way there could be no chance that the data could be distorted. The independent variable of this research study would be Concealing Transportation on Campus, as it is the variable that is regulated and controlled. The researcher would like to see that the crime rate on campus would be the dependent variable. Although, as previously mentioned, the correlation between firearms and crime has not been studied in depth. Therefore, due to the lack of current literature and empirical data, the dependent variable will remain unknown until proven otherwise. When it comes to the participant, the researcher wants to make sure that he or she is safe and has many guarantees. During face-to-face interactions and qualitative information on first-hand accounts of concealed carry and how it affected their lives. Discomfort and anger may occur. To combat these issues, interviewers will be paired with students of the same sex. Additionally, special services will be available for students who feel distressed due to the sensitivity of this topic. When conducting research, it is important to do so as thoroughly and honestly as possible, to do so some limitations must be recognised. The greatest limitation comes from surveys, which also represent the greatest source of information. The limitation is that participants may not answer questions truthfully. Some may not respond correctly because they may be ashamed of what they say, some deliberately lie to distort the data, and some people don't care and simply respond to what they hear. It is important for the researcher to be aware of these possible limitations so that he can be.