Topic > Separate but Equal is Equal: Plessy V Ferguson

The legal doctrine of “separate but equal is equal” was established in the Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson. Ferguson. Prior to this case, the Civil War ended in 1865 and the 13th Amendment was passed which ended the institution of slavery but did not grant rights to former slaves. In numerous states that passed racially discriminatory laws following the passage of the 13th Amendment, these laws became known as the Black Codes. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Homer Plessy was a mixed-race shoemaker, who participated in civil disobedience, Plessy violated the Separate but Equal. In this situation, Plessy attempted to board a segregated East Louisiana Railroad passenger car at Press and Royal Streets in New Orleans. As noted, numerous states, especially in the South, passed racially discriminatory laws. In Louisiana, a Separate Car Act was passed in 1890 that separated black and white passengers. Plessy opposed this act due to the unequal facilities inside these rail cars and the degradation of the nature of "Separate but Equal". With the degrading and challenging "Separate but Equal", Plessy was urged by the Comite des Citoyens which was a civil rights group. He agreed to ride on the white area of ​​the Covington-bound rail car. In doing so, Plessy refused to give up his seat and move to the colored area of ​​the car, which led to him being arrested by a private investigator hired by the Comite des Citoyens. This was a complete plan to challenge the railroad in which the railroad itself agrees to challenge it. As a result, Plessy was charged and fined 25 cents as his lawyers argued that the law violates the federal Constitution. The Louisiana state court ruled against Plessy, which set the stage for an appeal and appeal to the Supreme Court. In which the Supreme Court ruled that “hopeful but equal” facilities did not violate the 14th Amendment of 1896, which therefore upheld state-imposed taxes. Jim Crow laws. Over 50 years later, in Chicago in August 1955, Curtis Jones and Emmett Till take a train to visit their family in Mississippi. Fourteen-year-old Emmet Till, unaware of the unwritten laws of the Jim Crow South, was accused of whistling at Carolyn Bryant, who was a white cashier at a grocery store. On Sunday, four days later, Carolyn's husband and his better half Brother came to kidnap Emmett Till. Four days later, Emmett Till was found in a river, beaten and shot in the head. Roy Bryant and JW Milam were arrested for Till's murder. As a result, both men were acquitted and would later tell their story months later for a fee of four thousand dollars. He agreed with Associate Justice John Marshall Harlan of the United States Constitution, who cast the sole vote against the Supreme Court during Plessy v. his opinion that our Constitution is color blind and does not recognize or tolerate classes among citizens. This means that race is not what it seems and that it is easy for those who are against equality to appear as if they are for it. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Customize EssayIn Marshalls Eye's believes it is true that the system is color blind, but everyone else sees color. This means that he may be the only impartial judge. Applying this thought to the case of Emmett Till, it is false. Colorblind racism is the new principle that maintains systematic privilege against whites that shows racial inequality