Index IntroductionCorruption in contemporary businessWhy do employees pay a bribe?When do compliance and ethics programs help prevent bribe payments?What should companies do to overcome corruption?ConclusionIntroductionThe Corruption is a phenomenon that the whole world is dealing with today, whether it is a third world country or a superpower, everyone is impartial towards corruption. However, it is only in recent years as corruption has been brought to the fore that people are starting to recognize wrongdoing. The question then arises: what corruption really is and why it has not been discovered. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Corruption is like a quid pro quo process between public officials and corporate executives. It is the illegitimate process of granting favors as a means of carrying out tasks illegally, such as granting business rights, licenses, permits, industrial land allocation, tax breaks, awarding contracts, tendering and changing laws to meet needs of businesses. interest. Corruption was previously classified under political and legal studies, which many people avoided studying, but now, after the 1999 OECD Anti-Corruption Convention and the disintegration of numerous businesses, corruption and other illegal and illegitimate aspects of conducting commercial activities have gained the interest of critics. As a result of this recognition, approximately 25 articles have been published in the Journal of Business Ethics and six articles in Business Ethics Quarterly addressing illegal, illegitimate and corrupt aspects of business. The Strategic Management Journal has also published some publications focusing on the different reasons why corruption exists in contemporary business, but so far no work has been done on the point of corruption presenting itself as a “management decision making” problem. The CRDM is a potential contribution to the contemporary process of reconceptualizing the role of business and market economics in management theory and practice. Corruption in Contemporary Business Corruption is primarily seen in the context of how it is carried out and who initiates it when the real factor determining its severity should be the impact it leaves on the stakeholder community. Usually the definition of corruption is narrowed to the simple act of deviating from norms, laws, or jumping a queue or benefiting from an undue favor. But what decision makers fail to understand are forward-thinking stakeholders, who are affected indirectly or in the long term. One wrong decision made in urgent circumstances and managers find themselves taking part in acts of corruption that lead to the violation of human rights, the degradation of the environment and the endangerment of sustainable development. Just as cells are the building blocks of a life, business is the building block of an economy. The more a country does business domestically and internationally, the more success, fame and power it gains. However, if in such conditions, instead of promoting respect for human rights, environmental protection and sustainable development as a duty of business towards society, we began to deny them, then the very core of a civil society would be at stake , because from a stakeholder In perspective, not only individuals are at stake, but also morality, ethics and society. Why do employees pay a bribe? The most effective way to combat a problem is firstunderstand its reason for existence. Now that it has been established that corruption is a practice in the contemporary business world, it is time to find solutions to eliminate this practice. Seeing the growing concern about corruption, several companies have started anti-corruption campaigns to control the problem, however, despite this, some employees continue to pay a bribe. What needs to be understood in this context is that not all employees do so with bad intentions or in an attempt to climb higher, but sometimes this is driven by the pressure surrounding an employee to be good, to get the job done, and to be compatible and competent. Most people choose the easy way to get the star of the month reward. Furthermore, statistics show that employees of several companies do not take the employee code of conduct seriously, which makes it easy for them to break the rules. Both of these factors combined disrupt the overall environment of a workplace, to the point of making it unmanageable. Ashforth and Anand propose a three-step model for controlling the spread of illicit practices. In the initial stage, it makes management understand the position of employees in the practice of corruption; which is not always intentional. Some employees do it under pressure and after it is successful, the others follow suit. In this regard, since the employee who commits corrupt acts wins, gets the reward, and goes undetected, the second phase of the model continues in which other employees address the illicit behavior under the assumption that management encourages it. And finally, in the third stage, corruption becomes a practice rooted in the roots of a company where neither employees feel remorse for wrongdoing nor their ethics are questioned. This implies that simply hiring ethical employees is not enough, rather the important thing is to provide ethical behavior where a comprehensive compliance and ethics program is conducted. When do compliance and ethics programs help prevent bribe payments? The goal of such programs is to raise awareness among employees that paying a bribe is an illegal act that is not supported by the company. When they identify bad behavior instead of justifying or rationalizing it, they should contact authorities and managers to address the problem so that it is not subsidized but resolved. Ethical climate and ethical culture are two terms proposed by social psychologists who study the influence of ethical behavior on organizational contexts. An ethical climate is employees' perspective on appropriate behavior within an organization, and on the other hand, ethical culture refers to the organizational aspects of pursuing ethical behavior; such as reward systems. Now researchers have concluded that ethical climate and ethical culture are highly interrelated, and their simultaneous existence within an organization promotes the ethical behavior of its employees. From a meta-analytic review it emerged that the mere issuing of a code of ethics and conduct is not sufficient to guarantee its application, but it is necessary to guarantee employees an ethical culture; that the company has been strict in its implementation, only then an organization can be successful in reducing the act of corruption. Similarly, Spahn (2013) argued that when employees perceive that an organization abides by an ethical program only to protect its image and save its management from blame, then employees act in reverse and an increase in illegal activities than when a company implements a compliance and ethics program to promote a behaviorgeneral ethics and to punish wrongdoing and reward legitimate workers. In addition to this, Gutterman (2015) proposed another scenario that leads to employees losing the legitimacy of an ethical program; it's when companies implement it to satisfy external demands. As a result, employees are usually so motivated that they fail to even consider the relevant ethical issues that were actually being addressed; in this case corruption. This simply proves that implementing a compliance program is not enough, but the technique and meaning with which it is inaugurated has a lot of value for employees. So, whenever it comes to corruption; Every manager should focus first and foremost on enforcing ethical culture. What should?do companies do to defeat corruption?So far, the reasons for corruption; Paying bribes is practiced and why it could not be overcome have been discussed in this paper. Now it's time to discuss how to tackle the problem to eradicate it from the roots. In this regard, the first opinion that arises is that organizations analyze what corruption is for them and what responsibility they think they have towards the society in which they operate. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is what can lead a company to overcome corruption. . The topic of CSR has already been addressed previously; that every company is responsible for its own society to ensure the implementation of human rights, sustainable development and environmental protection. Regarding this concept, if all the personnel of an organization along with the personal vision of the organization are structured in the relevance of the importance of preserving CSR, then the work is done and the company is free from corruption. However, if one's morals and ethics are of no use, then the obvious course is to opt for the anti-corruption programs launched by the government. These programs are designed to increase transparency and accountability within the organization; from its officials to the delivery man. Along with the programs they also focus on strengthening and enforcing relevant laws associated with corruption. But researchers argue that these policies are ineffective until the underlying issues that lead a person to engage in illicit behavior are addressed. To certify their success, it is necessary to first consider the problems of poverty and inequality, enact and enforce anti-corruption laws, improve democracy, provide civil service and reform dysfunctional dimensions or aspects of government. Beyond that, a company must enter the fight against corruption into the contemporary business world comprehensively by designing their respective cultures, systems and structures so as to institutionalize the fight against corruption. Yacobian (2014) states that an effective framework to control corruption could be to start educating at entry levels about the evils of corruption, corruption detection and deterrence through the integration of corporate culture, organizational structure and system of compliance. And as a result of fighting corruption, organizations should structure the framework according to their vision of increasing the overall productivity of the company; which is becoming effective in terms of performance through increasing profits, market share, etc. Another important practice for overcoming corruption is the Corruption-Related Decision Making (CRDM) model (Roy, 2017). CRDM is a new strategic management concept that emphasizes ethical decision making while respecting human rights. The implementation of this model suggests that only if respect for human dignity is.