Technology is creeping into every aspect of our lives. From the simple smartphone that no one will leave home without, to the extremely advanced autonomous driving software that is evolving in the automotive sector, technology takes on a prevalent role in daily interactions and activities. At first glance, it seems that technology acts as a tool that makes things faster, easier and more efficient. According to professor Susan Dynarski, in the classroom, however, it seems that the effect is the opposite. In “Laptops are awesome. But not during a conference or meeting." Dynarski discusses the negative effects of using laptops in school. Dynarski lists experiments to support his reasoning and encourages other teachers to follow his example in banning electronics. Dynarski says using laptops in class distracts students and teachers should ban them from their rooms. While advocating for laptop-free classrooms, Dynarski successfully uses specific word choices and rhetorical elements to present his reasoning and evidence to readers. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay in “Laptops are cool. But not during a lecture or meeting,” University of Michigan professor Susan Dynarski shares her thoughts in a November 2017 New York Times publication. Dynarski says her class is an exception to many electronic classes, although there may be some benefits to the devices. Dynarski explains that there is plenty of evidence that laptops hurt students' performance more than they help them. Additionally, Dynarski calls “selection bias.” ” and refers to six different experiments conducted on the use of laptops in classrooms. The experiments are used as evidence to refute counterarguments and affirm the more negative effects of laptops. Dynarski concludes his article by suggesting that more research be done on laptops in college . Dynarski reiterates his opinion, this time with one exception: students with disabilities. Dynarski knowingly says this could represent a loss of privacy for these students, but emphasizes the advantages over the disadvantages. Dynarski concludes by suggesting that teachers at all levels should follow her example in the classroom. Dynarski is no stranger to writing these persuasive articles. Having earned a BA in Social Studies and an MA in Public Policy, both from Harvard, along with a PhD in Economics from MIT, Dynarski's writings have focused on influencing readers to improve financial aid for students , discuss the effectiveness of charter schools, and challenge readers. discuss the effects of tuition on private school attendance. With these educational topics in mind, Dynarski is targeting students, teachers, and academic influencers. Dynarski now works as a professor of economics, education and public policy at the University of Michigan. In his classes, Dynarski has seen firsthand the effects of laptop use. Dynarski intentionally writes to show his audience the negative effects of electronics and convince readers to stop using laptops in the classroom. Thanks to his publication in the New York Times, “Laptops are cool. But not during a conference or meeting." is more likely to be received by an older generation of the newspaper's readers and who are potentially part of a more liberal demographic than readers of other newspapers. Nonetheless, Dynarski's article remainscredible thanks to the newspaper's excellent reputation and history. In addition to some aspects of Dynarski's audience, the newspaper's readers may not be as technologically savvy, and these readers are more likely to agree with Dynarski's stance against laptops. The opposite effect may occur for progressive readers of the article who support advances in technology in social settings such as the classroom. As Dynarski writes to convince readers to stop using electronics in the classroom, one part of his target audience he may be missing is students. The current younger generation of students is much less likely to read and receive information from a newspaper, especially since they have access to a wide variety of news and sources on the Internet. Fortunately, the rest of Dynarski's desired audience, which is made up of teachers and professors, is more likely to read New York Times articles and this gives Dynarski an ideal platform to convince members of the academic community that laptops should be banned from school classrooms. .In the article, Dynarski's choice of words plays an important role in helping to persuade his audience. He uses specific words to draw attention to a point or to place emphasis on part of his argument. When Dynarski refers to laptops as a form of visual pollution, it creates a negative association in readers' minds. These striking images help develop Dynarski's argument that laptops are not suitable for the classroom. Dynarski also stirs an image in readers' minds when he refers to the numerous open, bright laptops that viewers will see used by a sea of ​​students upon entering a classroom. When Dynarski writes this way, he evokes an emotion in the reader. This display makes the classroom seem detached and impersonal with the use of laptops. With these distinctive word choices, Dynarski's position and information is presented effectively because it elicits a negative feeling from the reader towards laptops, which will help Dynarski's argument against them progress. Along with his choice of words, Dynarski uses many facts to present his argument to readers. In the article, Dynarski's main argument is that the use of laptops in the classroom is distracting and teachers should ban them from their classrooms. Dynarski cites experiments from York University and McMaster University showing that not only students with laptops, but their surrounding classmates were distracted by electronics. Dynarski explains this negative externality as visual pollution. The screen attracts viewers' attention and prevents them from concentrating on the lesson. Dynarski references this experiment to convince readers that laptops are indeed distracting. The use of facts in Dynarski's article helps convince the audience of his points and make readers feel that the claims are indisputable. In addition to using facts in his argument, Dynarski also references several esteemed universities to support his ideas. In addition to sharing evidence that laptops are distracting, Dynarski cites studies showing that students who use electronics in class tend to perform worse than those who use pen and paper. According to the results of the experiment, Dynarski says that although the handwritten versions of the notes were more concise, they included more salient issues discussed in the lecture. By sharing that these specific topics come from Princeton University and the University of California at Los Angeles, Dynarski provides reliable and trustworthy support for his.