Communication difficulty is common in society and can result in involuntary behaviors and involuntary situations. Such complications occur in both Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and Alice Sebold's The Lovely Bones as many characters demonstrate their inability to connect with others. In Shelley's gothic novel, the monster displays endless communication problems as those he surrounds himself with refuse to accept him due to his naivety and disgusting appearance, coupled with Victor's physical distancing from his creation, creating a barrier of any connection between them. For Susie, hardship comes from death and persistence in helping family and friends expose her killer, but her position in heaven and in between limits her ability to express herself to those she wishes to lead. Alternatively, Susie's ability to see what others think juxtaposes the monster's inability to articulate thoughts, but in both novels the authors create physical and emotional barriers, through outward appearances and troubled relationships. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay In The Lovely Bones, Susie's struggle to convey any communication is graphically depicted in the first chapter: "'Susie! Susie!' I heard my mother call. “Dinner is ready.” Inside me she grunted.” As the narrative changes, it describes both the location and the perception, with Sebold exemplifying the horror of Susie's rape by breaking down the barriers. physical and moral through non-consensual sex with a child, starting the novel with a repugnant atmosphere Barriers are similarly broken in Frankenstein, with Victor's creation of a new life demonstrating radical and immoral actions with the hope that. the monster is "a new species [that] would bless him as its creator", establishing the power to form new life, neither for better nor for worse. Shelley was influenced by the scientific revolution of the time, with biologists such as Luigi Galvani using the 'electricity to experiment on animals, and her husband, the radical romantic of Percy Shelley, wrote about her beliefs in social equality These influences make her novel undoubtedly ambitious, using Victor to illustrate how the laws of nature can be altered, to some extent, is apparently evident in the monster's response to their subsequent meeting on the mountain: “Yet you, my creator, detest and reject me, your monster, to whom you are bound by bonds dissoluble only by annihilation of one of us,” reveals that his struggles with society were caused by Frankenstein when he abandoned him, along with the metaphorical “ties” that “bound” them together, perhaps rebuilding the emotional barriers that were broken when Frankenstein abandoned the monster. The online article, Science fiction: The science that fed Frankenstein, confirms that the controversial scientific methods used in the novel sparked debate over whether the monster was responsible for his actions: "It is not simply the creation of life itself, the ambition of science, which is called into question. It is the ongoing moral choices and unforeseen ethical responsibilities that can arise from scientific advances.” The article confidently highlights Victor's unscrupulous use of science to create something unnatural and immoral, challenging contemporary Catholic beliefs that only God has the power to give and take life in the early 1800s and breaking the barriers of nature, causing the monster to ask rhetorical questions he would never know the answer to the question : “What did that mean?.