IndexThe Realism vs. Liberalism Debate: Similarities and DifferencesConclusionReferenceNeorealism and neoliberalism seek to provide "covering laws" or cover a wide variety of actions in one explanation conceptual causal relationships such as the Newtonian law of gravity which describes a certain relationship between all elements (attraction, which is also the DV or effect on another variable) based on mass and distance (independent factors or causal) without taking into account the specific or spectrum. The aim of the essay is to briefly explore the similarities and differences between realism and liberalism. We say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The Realism vs. Liberalism Debate: Similarities and Differences The main similarity between these two concepts, which influences how nations should act, is how they view the structure of the world. For both Realism and Liberalism “a situation of anarchy exists outside the confines of government”. This situation arises because there is no government in the world or a higher institution that controls relations between different states. The state would have to find a way to coexist with the life of this anarchic society, and how it can do so constitutes a great contrast between realism and liberalism. Realism, as well as liberalism, see war as something to be prevented, morality can be a determining factor in the latter intervening in a conflict. Liberalism assumes that states have a moral obligation to intervene when such principles are abused in the affairs of other states. These principles should be fundamental human rights that every person in the world should enjoy, regardless of their origin. According to liberalism, ideals such as order, democracy, justice and equality should be defended by states and international institutions if the latter fail in their duty. While realism emphasizes balancing actions between countries at the system level, liberalism looks at internal actions created by the engagement of internal and external pressures (internal politics is Waltz's second image). One strand of this thinking is that modern democratic regimes are less likely to go to war with each other (economic peace theory). A new formulation of liberalism aims to focus on national behavior or preferences, but to integrate systemic pressures by influencing those domestic likes and dislikes. Realism is not focused on the centralization of power in foreign affairs, while liberalism is focused on the centralization of power. The centralization of power effectively guarantees stability and security. Considering that this is both a qualitative and prescriptive theory or interpretation of international relations rooted in Renaissance Italy, balance of power is preferred. Indeed, it can be argued that the balance of power of European politics was a foreign element rather than the normal course of events in other international systems. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Customize EssayConclusion Overall it can be seen that both realism and liberalism try to bring a change in the legal system and society. As long as all objects have mass and distance, they can describe the relationship between each other. In the social sciences of IR, both liberalism and realism seek to do the same, but each examines a particular set of variables at a different level of study. Reference Miller, B. (2010). Explanations, 31(1), 134-164.