This would likely have the most negative impact on employees as the right to fair wages is one of the rights of employees as stakeholders of the company. The expectations placed on the employee and their performance are often the basis for determining salary rates. However, the government set a fair wage and the company did not comply with the outlined procedures. The reason this course of action raises a problem is due to the commitment to continuance. Employees are at high risk of having their rights violated, more so than employers, because employees are more dependent on the employer. Furthermore, most of the employees were foreigners or backpackers who were afraid of losing their jobs in a competitive market, so they did not want to disturb the management. This is an example of a commitment to continuity, which is also related to globalization. In this case, labor mobility has led workers to accept lower wages because they are already higher than they would be in their home country. Considering this answer with a utilitarian theory, no action taken would be less beneficial because employees are not paid adequately and the government would lose money in terms of taxation. This results in the greatest benefit only to the owners and managers of the company, so the lack of action would be morally incorrect when