To discern whether the decision was morally right, we must evaluate it based on external criteria and internal criteria. “External criteria…include Scripture and the teaching of the Church, the community and its values, moral principles, and relevant laws” (Panicola 70). Although the Scriptures and the Church do not specifically address this issue, we can conclude from the writings and teachings that it is wrong to hide the truth and forgive the person who commits a crime. This decision is not in harmony with the laws of the community. It would be unacceptable to the community because they would like to promote truthfulness and punishment of law breakers. This decision must also be evaluated based on internal criteria. For internal criteria, a person must look within to evaluate the decision. Does the person feel satisfied with the decision and promote these values? The doctor's decision does not give the internal sense of contentment; we feel “hatred, discontent…confusion” (Panicola 71). Nobody wants to become a liar, so it is not consistent with the kind of person one would like to become. Furthermore, emotions indicate that something is wrong, and these actions do not contribute to the moral benefits of the doctor. Derek's decision to hide the truth does not promote what is right for right relationships; it certainly doesn't give a sense of internal content. As a result, after evaluating the decision based on both internal and external criteria, it can be concluded that the decision made in the episode is morally wrong and must be changed to option.