The purpose of this essay is to demonstrate the reliability and reason why libertarianism is the most consistent of the three views, which refers to the idea that free will human is true, that one is undetermined and therefore morally responsible. In response to the quote in the essay, I disagree with Wolf. This essay will be further strengthened with the help of authors such as CA Campell, R. Taylor, and R. M. Chisholm. They present similar arguments, which essentially demonstrate that it could have been done differently and that one is the sole author of the volition. I will present the three most common arguments in support of libertarianism, I will present an objection against libertarianism and attempt to refute it, as well as reject a main argument of the other views. Consequently, this essay will demonstrate that one is held morally responsible for any act done or chosen by them, which qualifies as a human act. The libertarian vision consists in the fact that one's actions are not determined; however, they have free will, which is a precondition for moral responsibility. In essence, human acts are not determinate prior causes. Libertarianism is one of the views of incompatibilism along with hard determinism. The opposite of these views is compatibilism. An example of libertarianism is: right now you can stop reading this essay or continue reading this article. According to this statement, whether one can choose between one or the other is not determined one way or the other. Campbell's view on libertarianism is quite simple. Campbell suggests that to understand free will it is necessary to judge people based on their internal acts or intentions. To have freedom you must have a precondition of moral responsibility as well as a categorical analysis of freedom... middle of paper... Almighty God and the laws of time and space. However, as I stated before, for something to be determined, I believe it requires God. So by saying that you need to eliminate a God and other requirements to have free will, then you falsify determinism, thus making this view incorrect. All in all, each view on the philosophy of free will and determinism has many propositions, objects and concepts. counter-objections. In this essay I have shown the best proposals in favor of libertarianism, as well as an opposition to it to which I have raised a counter-objection. Furthermore, I explained the compatabalistic and hard deterministic views to which I raised objections. In the end, whether determinism or indeterminism, both are fraught with difficulties; however, I have provided the best explanation for free will, determinism, and whether an agent is morally responsible.