John Rawls' theory of justice is one of the most interesting philosophies to emerge in modern times. It was introduced in the 1970s when A Theory of Justice was published. It has been revised several times, most recently in 1999. Essentially, Rawlsian philosophy approaches justice according to the idea of ​​fairness. The idea is that justice is a complex concept and might differ depending on individual circumstances. Rawls argued that we are all ignorant about ourselves and others and, therefore, are unable – under such conditions – to determine or apply the principles of justice. These positions allowed Rawls to address two contemporary issues that are equally important, but which also tend to oppose their respective visions: freedom and equality. The Rawlsian theory of justice is influenced by Hume's philosophy with its critique of justice that gives priority to conventions and universal meaning (Forbes, 1985, 68). Hume spoke of artificial justice and Rawls coined the so-called artificial device or "original position", which serves to determine justice. It is also inspired by Kantian principles, which emphasize moral nobility and the complexity and richness of human life and experience. The beauty of Rawls' philosophy is its simplicity. The challenge of including the interests of all or a large number, as well as those of the individual, has been addressed by presupposing a certain degree of ignorance to achieve the desired equity. First of all, everything is rejected to get to the bottom of equity, and then justice is determined. This means that similar crimes would have different solutions because the conditions and parties in each crime are different. Also, there are crim...... middle of the card...... dual. This is why the philosophical framework could be very effective and applicable in contemporary times. We are in the midst of a culture characterized by a high degree of individualistic values. Balancing different interests is a challenge, and the rigid, universalist conception of justice may not work without committing further injustices. The diversity of criticisms of Rawlsian philosophy also underlies the breadth of its coverage and has served to highlight its universal application. Works Cited Forbes, Duncan. Hume's philosophical politics. Cambridge: CUP Press, 1985. PrintMaffettone, Sebastiano. Rawls: An Introduction. New York: Politics, 2010. Print.Rawls, John. A theory of justice, revised edition. Harvard University Press, 1999. Print.Sandel, Michael. Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Print.