In August 1849, a balloon armed with bombs took to the skies. This was the first recorded use of attack drones. The Austrian Habsburg Empire released 200 balloons into the sky and was sent to bomb the city of Venice to avoid starting a revolution. (Gale) Reconnaissance balloons were also launched during the American Civil War in an attempt to capture intelligence information. As time passed, technological advancements were made. A new type of drone has been created, which could be controlled electronically. (Gale) Now, in 2014, these drones have transformed into large solar-powered aircraft that have saved many soldiers on the ground. The US Army contracted the General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Company to produce the MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper, both of which are also useful for surveillance and intelligence gathering, and used to deploy missiles that target and eliminate threats. to the security of the United States. (Gale) While these drones have proven useful, there are many anti-drone advocates who believe that these drones have caused more civilian casualties than they prevent and allow the United States to escape the horrors of war. has been using UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) for decades, but in recent years they have become an important tool for gathering sensitive information abroad. The Obama administration has stepped up the use of drones in American efforts abroad, particularly for the targeted killing of high-profile militants, including in territories with which the United States is not technically at war. Proponents of the use of drones argue that UAVs help eliminate potential U.S. security threats and foreign threats without the risk of losing American lives. Drones not only provide a safe alternative to combat by delivering attacks with minimal collapse… middle of paper… and would not violate any human rights laws. Both sides can agree on one thing and that is the security of the “boots on the ground” nations. The fact is that drones help protect military personnel. Drones substantially reduce the risk of injury or death. Given the great demand for an agreement between the two conflicting parties, a drone court appears to be a rational approach. The trial would be fair and precise; which are two aspects that almost everyone might not agree to support. If the targets were examined in court first, the public would be more likely to accept the use of unmanned aircraft to carry out assassinations. With the increasing use of drones in the military, there needs to be agreement between civilians and military personnel. If there is no public support, drone funding will decline and US soldiers will once again be at risk in the field.