Those who apply the rule to particular cases must, of necessity, expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide how each works. The whole case is quite a model case, it was very interesting and the result was shocking. The process of this court case was very detailed and Marbury just wanted to be treated fairly when it came to taking his position away. It was not Marbury's fault that the documents were signed, sealed, but not delivered, the rules should definitely be changed. (CP83) “So, if a law is in opposition to the constitution: if both the law and the constitution apply to a particular case, so that the court must decide that case in accordance with the law, ignoring the constitution, ignoring the law: the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is the very essence of judicial duty.” Basically the court has to figure out which, by claiming these conflicting guidelines, legislates on that body of evidence. This could be of the precise character for Legal