However theses differ stating that his job is to target sports teams that we Native Americans as mascots, while the first article discusses issues related to Native Americans and sports teams. The Arthur uses various rhetorical appeals with respect to Shakley's article. Logos, even in Shakley's article, is dominant. In the introduction he uses both the logos and pathos of his first encounter with the subject. It is stated that he “remembers a time when he went into a store with his grandfather in El Reno, Oklahoma. This experience was similar to the background story of the first article in the introduction. She says it was the early 1950s and shopkeepers told the six-year-old girl she had to leave because she was a black Indian. This is similar to Shakley's article because he begins the article with a similar topic, providing an initial encounter with this one. It appears to be pathos because she said she felt small, insecure and scared because she had dark skin. Similar to Shakley's article, the rhetorical error appears overly sentimental, due to the problem he faced at the store. We can compare it to the first article, due to the emotions described, but the